Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:33

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Pacific sediment cores unlock millions of years of climate history - Earth.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
I see lots of pictures of women who have huge clits are they real or what?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Were knights’ lances practical weapons, or were they just for sports?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What are some reasons why some people may be against stay-at-home dads or working moms?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Volcanic Eruptions Can Create Ice in The Sky, And We Finally Know How - ScienceAlert